The Progressive Design Build Delivery Method

Get an overview of the progressive design build model, its pros and cons, plus alternative delivery methods
What is the integrated project delivery method?

What is a progressive design build project?

A progressive design build (PDB) project is an alternative project delivery method that combines design and construction services into a single contract. 

Progressive design build projects are typically procured using a qualifications-based selection process; you, as the project owner, select the design-builder based on their qualifications and experience, rather than simply on price. This approach allows you to choose a team you believe is best suited to deliver the project on time, on budget, and to a high standard of quality.

The progressive design build process

The PDB process typically has two phases:

The progressive design build process

Phase 1: Developing the project scope and design

You (the owner) and the design-builder you choose collaborate to develop the project's design and budget. This phase is typically completed on a time and materials basis, with the goal of developing a clear understanding of the project's scope, cost, and schedule.

Phase 2: Finalizing the design and construction

The design-builder finalizes the design and constructs the project. This phase is typically completed on a lump sum or guaranteed maximum price basis.

 

Progressive design build vs traditional design build

The key difference between PDB and traditional design build (TDB) is the timing of the guaranteed maximum price. In a TDB project, the GMP is typically finalized once the design is complete. In a PDB project, the GMP is negotiated progressively as the design develops (i.e. into phase two). This enables more control over the cost and scope of the project throughout the design process.

Another difference between PDB and TDB is the level of collaboration between the owner and the design-builder. In a PDB project, the owner and the design-builder work together more closely to develop the design and budget. 

PDB vs TDB comparison

Timing of GMP

Progressive Design Build: Negotiated progresively as the design develops

Traditional Design Build: Finalized once the design is complete

Level of collaboration

Progressive Design Build: High

Traditional Design Build: Medium

Risk Sharing

Progressive Design Build: More risk is shared with the design-builder

Traditional Design Build: Less risk is shared with the design-builder

Approriateness for complex projects

Progressive Design Build: High

Traditional Design Build: Medium

Appropriateness for projects with a high degree of uncertainty

Progressive Design Build: High

Traditional Design Build: Medium

Appropriateness for projects where the owner wants to have a high level of involvement in the design process

Progressive Design Build: High

Traditional Design Build: Medium

 

Progressive design build examples/case studies

Progressive design build examples/case studies

San Francisco International Airport modernization

This $7.3 billion modernization program is being delivered using PDB. The project team has been able to identify and address potential design and constructability issues early on, which has helped to avoid costly delays and change orders later in the project. (source)

North Mason Regional Fire Authority’s new headquarters

Through the collaborative efforts of the single project team, the facility was delivered on time and within budget in 2022. The project’s success demonstrates the effectiveness and flexibility of PDB delivery on projects with a tight schedule and budget constraints. (source)

Theatre District Living and Learning Neighborhood

PDB was chosen as the delivery method here in order to reduce the cost of competition for design-build teams hoping to work with the university. The project owner commented that, in the progressive design-build environment, “it’s all about teamwork and collaboration. It’s important to know that you can trust your partners all the way up and down the scale.” (source)

Alternatives to the progressive design build delivery method

Agency CM

Agency CM, or Agency Construction Management, is a project delivery method in which the owner hires a construction manager (CM) to provide preconstruction services and to manage the construction of the project. The CM is usually hired early in the project planning process and works closely with the owner to develop the project design and budget. The CM also selects and manages the subcontractors who will construct the project.

Construction manager at risk (CMAR)

In a CMAR project, the owner hires a construction manager to provide preconstruction services and to manage the construction of the project, as in agency CM. The difference is that the construction manager also assumes some of the risk associated with the project.

Public private partnership (PPP)

A public-private partnership (PPP) is a contractual arrangement between a public agency and a private sector entity. In a PPP, the private sector entity provides financing, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of a public infrastructure project. PPPs are often used for large and complex infrastructure projects, such as highways, bridges, and water treatment plants.

Design bid build

Design bid build (DBB) is the most traditional project delivery method. Also known as traditional design build (TDB), in a DBB project the owner hires a designer to develop the project design and then hires a contractor to construct the project based on the design. The DBB process is typically competitive, with the owner selecting the designer and contractor based on their bids.

Alliance contracting

Alliance contracting is a collaborative project delivery method in which the owner, designer, contractor, and other stakeholders work together as a single team to deliver the project. The team shares all risks and rewards equally. Alliances are typically used for very large and complex projects with a high degree of uncertainty.

Integrated project delivery (IPD)

IPD is a collaborative project delivery method that brings together the owner, designer, contractor, and other stakeholders early in the project to develop a shared vision for the project. The team then works together to develop and execute the project plan.

Design-build-finance-maintain (DBFM)

DBFM is a comprehensive project delivery method that includes the design, construction, financing, and maintenance of the project. The design-build firm is responsible for all aspects of the project, from the initial concept to the final completion.

Manage your construction procurement process safely and efficiently with Ansarada

Now you can get started for free, with full access, unlimited internal users, no time limits and full support. No risk, no obligation and no fee until the first external guest user or bidder logs in to the system
Start now for free

 

FAQ's

The main difference between an alliance and PDB is the level of collaboration and risk sharing between the owner and the design-builder.

An alliance is a highly collaborative project delivery method in which the owner and the design-builder work together as a single team to deliver the project. The team shares all risks and rewards equally.

PDB is a type of design-build where the owner and design-builder collaborate to develop the project design and budget early in the project. However, the design-builder is still responsible for the final design and construction of the project.

PDB and Construction Manager/General Contractor (CMGC) are two project delivery methods that are often compared. However, there are some key differences between the two.

In a PDB project, the owner contracts with a single design-build team early in the project planning process. The team is responsible for both the design and construction of the project. The owner and the design-build team work collaboratively to develop the project design and budget. The design-build team then finalizes the design and constructs the project.

In a CMGC project, the owner contracts with a construction manager (CM), not a design-build team. The CM is responsible for managing the construction of the project and works with the owner to develop the project design and budget. Once the design is complete, the CM selects a general contractor (GC) to construct the project.